"The Willow King" by Meelis Friedenthal, translated by Matthew
Hyde
Literary folk-horror or fictional history?
The 16th and 17th
Centuries were an important period for the development of science as we know
it. Unfortunately, the history we’re generally fed is a black-and-white
narrative made of heroes and villians, with brave, progressive scientists
forging ahead despite the supernatural trammels of religion (and, more
specifically, the censorship of the Roman Catholic Church and its nefarious
Inquisition).
The truth is much
more nuanced and interesting. For a start, within science itself there were
several competing approaches. The “mechanical science” of Kepler and Newton
would eventually hold sway, but one should not discount the influence of the
“natural philosophers” – early chemists and biologists such as Robert Boyle.
Natural philosophers tended to follow theologically suspect pantheistic views
(hence their clashes with the Church) but most of them also dabbled in alchemy
and magic even whilst trying to study these esoteric subjects “empirically”. Some
natural philosophers investigated folk remedies and witches' spells, in the
belief that they had a basis in “real” science. Thus we meet, for instance, Jan
Baptista van Helmont, a 17th Century scholar from the “Spanish Netherlands”
(modern-day Belgium), who published studies on a method for treating gunshot
wounds, involving dipping the offending weapon itself in a salve made up of,
amongst other dubious ingredients, blood and “moss taken from a skull”. But it
would be wrong to draw too clear a line between the “natural” and “mechanical”
philosophers and brand the latter as more empirical and secular in approach.
Newton dabbled in alchemy too, and Kepler had his quasi-supernatural theories
about the “music of the spheres”. On the other hand, Helmont, when not hunting
for moss in graveyards, was carrying out groundbreaking experiments which have
gained him the epithet of “father of pneumatic chemistry”. In other words, this
was an era in which the greatest and most rational of scientific minds held
opinions which were, by present-day standards at least, manifestly irrational.
(Some books which delve into these matters : Miracles at the Jesus Oak: Histories of the Supernatural
in Reformation Europe, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, God's Philosophers: How the Medieval World Laid the
Foundations of Modern Science).
In his novel “The
Bees” (renamed as “The Willow King” in Matthew Hyde ’s
excellent translation) Meelis Friedenthal takes us back to the late 17th
Century and immerses us into the philosophical and scientific debates of the
age. His protagonist Laurentius is a scholar who has just arrived to complete
his medical studies at Dorpat (modern-day Tartu, Estonia), after having hastily
abandoned his course at the University of Leiden under suspicion of heresy.
Laurentius embodies the contradictions of his world. Well abreast of the
cutting-edge works of Boyle and Descartes, he nonetheless clings on to the
outmoded views of Aristotle and the medical theories of Galen regarding the
body’s “four humours”. Besides, Laurentius appears to be still in thrall to the
superstitions of the common people. Over the course of a feverish week spent in
a rain-sogged Estonia, where peasants are suffering a terrifying famine and
word is spreading of a mysterious and devilish “willow king”, he finds himself
taken over by the supernatural dread which marked his boyhood.
This is undoubtedly
a quirky work or – if you are feeling ungenerous – a flawed one. Apart from a
few chapters, the novel is largely rendered in a third-person narrative which
generally follows the interior monologues of Laurentius, interspersed with
occasional, pointless exclamations (“Ah!”, “Right!”, “Hopeless!”, “Very well!”)
The characters often indulge in learned explanations and debates, providing us
(quite unsubtly) with historical context and an overview of current
philosophical trends. The plot is initially sketchy and eventually downright
confusing.
Yet, despite my
reservations, I lapped this novel up, haunted by its dark atmosphere and the
author’s uncanny ability to recreate not just the sights and sounds of 17th
century Estonia, but also the very thoughts of his characters. Indeed, my take
on the novel is that it is a journey into the mindset of the period, and that
the more fantastical parts of the plot are meant to represent the (for us)
irrational beliefs of the time. Friedenthal moves deftly between genres – this
is, nominally, a historical novel but, when Friedenthal pulls out all the
stops, it ventures into Gothic and folk-horror territory and becomes
deliciously creepy.
One final tip - it
makes sense to read the author’s afterword before delving into
the book. It gives context to the novel without any spoilers and might make the
work more intelligible to those who are new to the exciting historical period
it portrays.
"The Willow King" by Meelis Friedenthal, translated by Matthew Hyde
Literary folk-horror or fictional history?
Paperback, 288 pages
Published January 5th 2017 by Pushkin Press (first published 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment